Explore the complete details of GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER VS Quadro T1200 Mobile, including specs, performance benchmarks
GeForce RTX 4090
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 5090 D
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 5080
NVIDIAQuadro K5000
NVIDIAIris Xe Graphics G7
IntelGraphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)
IntelGeForce GTX 570
NVIDIAGraphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)
UnknownRadeon RX 460 Mobile
AMDGeForce GTX 750 Ti
NVIDIAGRID M60-8Q
NVIDIARadeon HD 7850
AMDThe GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER GPU by NVIDIA. features a Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) architecture. with 8448 CUDA cores. and a boost clock of 2610 MHz MHz. It offers GDDR6X memory with 16 GB GB capacity and a 256 Bit-bit interface. delivering a bandwidth of 672.3 GB/s GB/s. With a power consumption (TDP) of 285W. it supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), Vulkan 1.3, DLSS 1 for enhanced performance.
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER GPU by NVIDIA. features a Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) architecture. with 8448 CUDA cores. and a boost clock of 2610 MHz MHz. It offers GDDR6X memory with 16 GB GB capacity and a 256 Bit-bit interface. delivering a bandwidth of 672.3 GB/s GB/s. With a power consumption (TDP) of 285W. it supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), Vulkan 1.3, DLSS 1 for enhanced performance.
Basic details about the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER, including manufacturer, ranking, and release date.
|
|
|
---|---|---|
Manufacturer | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
Ranking | 8 | 307 |
Popularity Rank | 84 | not in top-100 |
Architecture | Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) | Turing (2018−2022) |
GPU code name | AD103 | TU117 |
Market Segmente | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
Length - Width | 310 mm - 3-slot | N/A - N/A |
Release Date | 8 January 2024 | 12 April 2021 |
PerformanceDetails on clock speeds, cores, and floating-point processing power of GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER VS Quadro T1200 Mobile. |
||
Core Clock Speed | 2340 MHz | 855 MHz |
Boost Clock Speed | 2610 MHz | 1425 MHz |
Floating Point Processing Power | 44.1 TFLOPS | 2.918 TFLOPS |
No of Transistors | 45,900 million | 4,700 million |
CUDA Cores | 8448 | 1024 |
Ray Tracing Cores | 66 | N/A |
Tensor Cores | 264 | N/A |
Texture Fill Rate | 689.0 | 91.20 |
ROPs | 96 | 32 |
Available display connectors and API compatibility for enhanced performance.
|
|
|
---|---|---|
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a | No outputs |
HDMI | 1 | N/A |
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.6 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 3.0 | 3.0 |
Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.2 |
CUDA | 8.9 | 7.5 |
DLSS | 1 | N/A |
TMUs | 264 | 64 |
Memory & BusInformation on memory type, capacity, and bandwidth to evaluate data processing power. |
||
Memory Type | GDDR6X | GDDR6 |
Maximum RAM | 16 GB | 4 GB |
Memory Bus Width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory Clock Speed | 1313 MHz | 1250 MHz |
Memory Bandwidth | 672.3 GB/s GB/s | 160.0 GB/s GB/s |
Resizable BAR | 1 | N/A |
Power & EfficiencyPower consumption, efficiency, and additional power requirements. |
||
Power Consumption (TDP) | 285 W | 18 W |
Power Efficiency | 19.73 | 73.08 |
Manufacturing Process | 5 nm | 12 nm |
Supplementary Power Connectors | 1x 16-pin | N/A |
Here are some of the closest competitors to this GPU. Compare their power consumption, efficiency, and additional power requirements.
Here are some of the closest competitors to this GPU. Compare their power consumption, efficiency, and additional power requirements.