Explore the complete details of GeForce RTX 4070 Ti VS Radeon Pro Duo, including specs, performance benchmarks
GeForce RTX 4090
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 5090 D
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 5080
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4080
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4080 SUPER
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 5070 Ti
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4070 Ti
NVIDIARadeon RX 7900 XTX
AMDRTX 5000 Ada Generation
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3090 Ti
NVIDIAThe GeForce RTX 4070 Ti GPU by NVIDIA. features a Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) architecture. with 7680 CUDA cores. and a boost clock of 2610 MHz MHz. It offers GDDR6X memory with 12 GB GB capacity and a 192 Bit-bit interface. delivering a bandwidth of 504.2 GB/s GB/s. With a power consumption (TDP) of 285W. it supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), Vulkan 1.3, DLSS 1 for enhanced performance.
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti GPU by NVIDIA. features a Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) architecture. with 7680 CUDA cores. and a boost clock of 2610 MHz MHz. It offers GDDR6X memory with 12 GB GB capacity and a 192 Bit-bit interface. delivering a bandwidth of 504.2 GB/s GB/s. With a power consumption (TDP) of 285W. it supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), Vulkan 1.3, DLSS 1 for enhanced performance.
Basic details about the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti, including manufacturer, ranking, and release date.
|
![]() |
|
---|---|---|
Manufacturer | NVIDIA | AMD |
Ranking | 9 | 275 |
Popularity Rank | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Architecture | Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) | GCN 3.0 (2014−2019) |
GPU code name | AD104 | Capsaicin |
Market Segmente | Desktop | Workstation |
Length - Width | 285 mm - 2-slot | 277 mm - 2-slot |
Release Date | 3 January 2023 | 26 April 2016 |
PerformanceDetails on clock speeds, cores, and floating-point processing power of GeForce RTX 4070 Ti VS Radeon Pro Duo. |
||
Core Clock Speed | 2310 MHz | N/A |
Boost Clock Speed | 2610 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Floating Point Processing Power | 40.09 TFLOPS | 8.192 TFLOPS ×2 |
No of Transistors | 35,800 million | 8,900 million |
CUDA Cores | 7680 | 4096 ×2 |
Ray Tracing Cores | 60 | N/A |
Tensor Cores | 240 | N/A |
Texture Fill Rate | 626.4 | 256.0 ×2 |
ROPs | 80 | 64 ×2 |
Available display connectors and API compatibility for enhanced performance.
|
![]() |
|
---|---|---|
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
HDMI | 1 | 1 |
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | N/A |
Shader Model | 6.7 | N/A |
OpenGL | 4.6 | N/A |
OpenCL | 3.0 | N/A |
Vulkan | 1.3 | N/A |
CUDA | 8.9 | N/A |
DLSS | 1 | N/A |
TMUs | 240 | 256 ×2 |
Memory & BusInformation on memory type, capacity, and bandwidth to evaluate data processing power. |
||
Memory Type | GDDR6X | High Bandwidth Memory (HBM) |
Maximum RAM | 12 GB | 8 GB ×2 |
Memory Bus Width | 192 Bit | 4096 Bit ×2 |
Memory Clock Speed | 1313 MHz | 500 MHz |
Memory Bandwidth | 504.2 GB/s GB/s | 512 GB/s ×2 GB/s |
Resizable BAR | 1 | N/A |
Power & EfficiencyPower consumption, efficiency, and additional power requirements. |
||
Power Consumption (TDP) | 285 W | 350 W |
Power Efficiency | 19.68 | 4.12 |
Manufacturing Process | 4 nm | 28 nm |
Supplementary Power Connectors | 1x 16-pin | 3x 8-pin |
Here are some of the closest competitors to this GPU. Compare their power consumption, efficiency, and additional power requirements.
Here are some of the closest competitors to this GPU. Compare their power consumption, efficiency, and additional power requirements.