Explore the complete details of Iris Plus Graphics VS GeForce RTX 5090, including specs, performance benchmarks
GeForce RTX 5090
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4090
NVIDIAQuadro K5000
NVIDIAIris Xe Graphics G7
IntelGraphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)
IntelGeForce GTX 570
NVIDIAGraphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)
UnknownGeForce GTX 750 Ti
NVIDIARadeon RX 460 Mobile
AMDGRID M60-8Q
NVIDIARadeon HD 7850
AMDRadeon HD 8970M
AMDThe Iris Plus Graphics GPU by Intel. features a Generation 11.0 (2019−2021) architecture. with 512 CUDA cores. and a boost clock of 1000 MHz MHz. It offers System Shared memory with System Shared GB capacity and a System Shared-bit interface. With a power consumption (TDP) of 15W. it supports DirectX 12 (12_1) for enhanced performance.
The Iris Plus Graphics GPU by Intel. features a Generation 11.0 (2019−2021) architecture. with 512 CUDA cores. and a boost clock of 1000 MHz MHz. It offers System Shared memory with System Shared GB capacity and a System Shared-bit interface. With a power consumption (TDP) of 15W. it supports DirectX 12 (12_1) for enhanced performance.
Basic details about the Iris Plus Graphics, including manufacturer, ranking, and release date.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Intel | NVIDIA |
| Ranking | 689 | 2 |
| Popularity Rank | not in top-100 | 25 |
| Architecture | Generation 11.0 (2019−2021) | Blackwell 2.0 (2025) |
| GPU code name | Ice Lake GT2 | GB202 |
| Market Segmente | Desktop | Desktop |
| Length - Width | N/A - IGP | 304 mm - 2-slot |
| Release Date | no data | 30 January 2025 |
PerformanceDetails on clock speeds, cores, and floating-point processing power of Iris Plus Graphics VS GeForce RTX 5090. |
||
| Core Clock Speed | N/A | 2017 MHz |
| Boost Clock Speed | 1000 MHz | 2407 MHz |
| Floating Point Processing Power | 1.024 TFLOPS | 104.8 TFLOPS |
| No of Transistors | N/A | 92,200 million |
| CUDA Cores | 512 | 21760 |
| Ray Tracing Cores | N/A | 170 |
| Tensor Cores | N/A | 680 |
| Texture Fill Rate | 32.00 | 1,637 |
| ROPs | 8 | 176 |
Available display connectors and API compatibility for enhanced performance.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 5.0 x16 |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x HDMI 2.1b, 3x DisplayPort 2.1b |
| HDMI | N/A | 1 |
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Shader Model | N/A | 6.8 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | N/A | 3.0 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.4 |
| CUDA | N/A | 12.0 |
| DLSS | N/A | 1 |
| TMUs | 32 | 680 |
Memory & BusInformation on memory type, capacity, and bandwidth to evaluate data processing power. |
||
| Memory Type | System Shared | GDDR7 |
| Maximum RAM | System Shared | 32 GB |
| Memory Bus Width | System Shared | 512 Bit |
| Memory Clock Speed | System Shared | 1750 MHz |
| Memory Bandwidth | N/A GB/s | 1.79 TB/s GB/s |
| Resizable BAR | N/A | 1 |
Power & EfficiencyPower consumption, efficiency, and additional power requirements. |
||
| Power Consumption (TDP) | 15 W | 575 W |
| Power Efficiency | 21.49 | 12.41 |
| Manufacturing Process | 10 nm | 5 nm |
| Supplementary Power Connectors | N/A | 1x 16-pin |
Here are some of the closest competitors to this GPU. Compare their power consumption, efficiency, and additional power requirements.
Here are some of the closest competitors to this GPU. Compare their power consumption, efficiency, and additional power requirements.