Explore the complete details of Quadro 600 VS GeForce GTX 690, including specs, performance benchmarks
GeForce RTX 5090
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4090
NVIDIAQuadro K5000
NVIDIAIris Xe Graphics G7
IntelGraphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)
IntelGeForce GTX 570
NVIDIAGraphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)
UnknownGeForce GTX 750 Ti
NVIDIARadeon RX 460 Mobile
AMDGRID M60-8Q
NVIDIARadeon HD 7850
AMDRadeon HD 8970M
AMDThe Quadro 600 GPU by NVIDIA. features a Fermi (2010−2014) architecture. with 96 CUDA cores. It offers DDR3 memory with 1 GB GB capacity and a 128 Bit-bit interface. delivering a bandwidth of 25.6 GB/s GB/s. With a power consumption (TDP) of 40W. it supports DirectX 12 (11_0), Vulkan N/A for enhanced performance.
The Quadro 600 GPU by NVIDIA. features a Fermi (2010−2014) architecture. with 96 CUDA cores. It offers DDR3 memory with 1 GB GB capacity and a 128 Bit-bit interface. delivering a bandwidth of 25.6 GB/s GB/s. With a power consumption (TDP) of 40W. it supports DirectX 12 (11_0), Vulkan N/A for enhanced performance.
Basic details about the Quadro 600, including manufacturer, ranking, and release date.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| Ranking | 1060 | 381 |
| Popularity Rank | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Architecture | Fermi (2010−2014) | Kepler (2012−2018) |
| GPU code name | GF108 | GK104 |
| Market Segmente | Workstation | Desktop |
| Length - Width | 168 mm - 1-slot | 279 mm - 2-slot |
| Release Date | 13 December 2010 | 3 May 2012 |
PerformanceDetails on clock speeds, cores, and floating-point processing power of Quadro 600 VS GeForce GTX 690. |
||
| Core Clock Speed | 640 MHz | 915 MHz |
| Boost Clock Speed | N/A | 1019 MHz |
| Floating Point Processing Power | 0.2458 TFLOPS | 3.13 TFLOPS ×2 |
| No of Transistors | 585 million | 3,540 million |
| CUDA Cores | 96 | 3072 ×2 |
| Ray Tracing Cores | N/A | N/A |
| Tensor Cores | N/A | N/A |
| Texture Fill Rate | 10.24 | 130.4 ×2 |
| ROPs | 8 | 32 ×2 |
Available display connectors and API compatibility for enhanced performance.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort | Two Dual Link DVI-I. One Dual link DVI-D. One Mini-Displayport 1.2 |
| HDMI | N/A | 0 |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | N/A |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | N/A |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | N/A |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | N/A |
| Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
| CUDA | 2.1 | N/A |
| DLSS | N/A | N/A |
| TMUs | 16 | 128 ×2 |
Memory & BusInformation on memory type, capacity, and bandwidth to evaluate data processing power. |
||
| Memory Type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM | 1 GB | 4 GB (4 GB per GPU) GDDR5 ×2 |
| Memory Bus Width | 128 Bit | 512-bit (256-bit per GPU) ×2 |
| Memory Clock Speed | 800 MHz | 1502 MHz |
| Memory Bandwidth | 25.6 GB/s GB/s | 384 GB/s ×2 GB/s |
| Resizable BAR | N/A | N/A |
Power & EfficiencyPower consumption, efficiency, and additional power requirements. |
||
| Power Consumption (TDP) | 40 W | 300 W |
| Power Efficiency | 2.36 | 3.22 |
| Manufacturing Process | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Supplementary Power Connectors | None | 2x 8-pin |
Here are some of the closest competitors to this GPU. Compare their power consumption, efficiency, and additional power requirements.
Here are some of the closest competitors to this GPU. Compare their power consumption, efficiency, and additional power requirements.