Explore the complete details of Quadro K4200 VS GeForce GTX 1050 Ti, including specs, performance benchmarks
GeForce RTX 5090
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4090
NVIDIAQuadro K5000
NVIDIAIris Xe Graphics G7
IntelGraphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)
IntelGeForce GTX 570
NVIDIAGraphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)
UnknownGeForce GTX 750 Ti
NVIDIARadeon RX 460 Mobile
AMDRadeon HD 7850
AMDGRID M60-8Q
NVIDIARadeon HD 8970M
AMDThe Quadro K4200 GPU by NVIDIA. features a Kepler (2012−2018) architecture. with 1344 CUDA cores. and a boost clock of 784 MHz MHz. It offers GDDR5 memory with 4 GB GB capacity and a 256 Bit-bit interface. delivering a bandwidth of 172.8 GB/s GB/s. With a power consumption (TDP) of 108W. it supports DirectX 12 (11_0), Vulkan + for enhanced performance.
The Quadro K4200 GPU by NVIDIA. features a Kepler (2012−2018) architecture. with 1344 CUDA cores. and a boost clock of 784 MHz MHz. It offers GDDR5 memory with 4 GB GB capacity and a 256 Bit-bit interface. delivering a bandwidth of 172.8 GB/s GB/s. With a power consumption (TDP) of 108W. it supports DirectX 12 (11_0), Vulkan + for enhanced performance.
Basic details about the Quadro K4200, including manufacturer, ranking, and release date.
|
|
|
---|---|---|
Manufacturer | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
Ranking | 449 | 348 |
Popularity Rank | not in top-100 | 6 |
Architecture | Kepler (2012−2018) | Pascal (2016−2021) |
GPU code name | GK104 | GP107 |
Market Segmente | Workstation | Desktop |
Length - Width | 241 mm - 1-slot | 145 mm - 2-slot |
Release Date | 22 July 2014 | 25 October 2016 |
PerformanceDetails on clock speeds, cores, and floating-point processing power of Quadro K4200 VS GeForce GTX 1050 Ti. |
||
Core Clock Speed | 771 MHz | 1291 MHz |
Boost Clock Speed | 784 MHz | 1392 MHz |
Floating Point Processing Power | 2.107 TFLOPS | 2.138 TFLOPS |
No of Transistors | 3,540 million | 3,300 million |
CUDA Cores | 1344 | 768 |
Ray Tracing Cores | N/A | N/A |
Tensor Cores | N/A | N/A |
Texture Fill Rate | 87.81 | 66.82 |
ROPs | 32 | 32 |
Available display connectors and API compatibility for enhanced performance.
|
|
|
---|---|---|
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
HDMI | N/A | 1 |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | N/A |
Shader Model | 5.1 | N/A |
OpenGL | 4.6 | N/A |
OpenCL | 1.2 | N/A |
Vulkan | + | N/A |
CUDA | 3.0 | N/A |
DLSS | N/A | N/A |
TMUs | 112 | 48 |
Memory & BusInformation on memory type, capacity, and bandwidth to evaluate data processing power. |
||
Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Memory Bus Width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory Clock Speed | 1350 MHz | 7008 MHz |
Memory Bandwidth | 172.8 GB/s GB/s | 112 GB/s GB/s |
Resizable BAR | N/A | N/A |
Power & EfficiencyPower consumption, efficiency, and additional power requirements. |
||
Power Consumption (TDP) | 108 W | 75 W |
Power Efficiency | 7.11 | 14.88 |
Manufacturing Process | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Supplementary Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin | None |
Here are some of the closest competitors to this GPU. Compare their power consumption, efficiency, and additional power requirements.
Here are some of the closest competitors to this GPU. Compare their power consumption, efficiency, and additional power requirements.