Explore the complete details of Quadro K5200 VS GeForce GTX 570, including specs, performance benchmarks
GeForce RTX 5090
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4090
NVIDIAQuadro K5000
NVIDIAIris Xe Graphics G7
IntelGraphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)
IntelGeForce GTX 570
NVIDIAGraphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)
UnknownGeForce GTX 750 Ti
NVIDIARadeon RX 460 Mobile
AMDGRID M60-8Q
NVIDIARadeon HD 7850
AMDRadeon HD 8970M
AMDThe Quadro K5200 GPU by NVIDIA. features a Kepler (2012−2018) architecture. with 2304 CUDA cores. and a boost clock of 771 MHz MHz. It offers GDDR5 memory with 8 GB GB capacity and a 256 Bit-bit interface. delivering a bandwidth of 192.3 GB/s GB/s. With a power consumption (TDP) of 150W. it supports DirectX 12 (11_1), Vulkan + for enhanced performance.
The Quadro K5200 GPU by NVIDIA. features a Kepler (2012−2018) architecture. with 2304 CUDA cores. and a boost clock of 771 MHz MHz. It offers GDDR5 memory with 8 GB GB capacity and a 256 Bit-bit interface. delivering a bandwidth of 192.3 GB/s GB/s. With a power consumption (TDP) of 150W. it supports DirectX 12 (11_1), Vulkan + for enhanced performance.
Basic details about the Quadro K5200, including manufacturer, ranking, and release date.
|
|
|
---|---|---|
Manufacturer | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
Ranking | 357 | 478 |
Popularity Rank | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Architecture | Kepler (2012−2018) | Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014) |
GPU code name | GK110B | GF110 |
Market Segmente | Workstation | Desktop |
Length - Width | 267 mm - 2-slot | 267 mm - 2-slot |
Release Date | 22 July 2014 | 7 December 2010 |
PerformanceDetails on clock speeds, cores, and floating-point processing power of Quadro K5200 VS GeForce GTX 570. |
||
Core Clock Speed | 667 MHz | 732 MHz |
Boost Clock Speed | 771 MHz | N/A |
Floating Point Processing Power | 3.553 TFLOPS | 1.405 TFLOPS |
No of Transistors | 7,080 million | 3,000 million |
CUDA Cores | 2304 | 480 |
Ray Tracing Cores | N/A | N/A |
Tensor Cores | N/A | N/A |
Texture Fill Rate | 148.0 | 43.92 |
ROPs | 48 | 40 |
Available display connectors and API compatibility for enhanced performance.
|
|
|
---|---|---|
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 2x DisplayPort | Mini HDMITwo Dual Link DVI |
HDMI | N/A | 1 |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.2 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | + | N/A |
CUDA | 3.5 | + |
DLSS | N/A | N/A |
TMUs | 192 | 60 |
Memory & BusInformation on memory type, capacity, and bandwidth to evaluate data processing power. |
||
Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM | 8 GB | 1280 MB |
Memory Bus Width | 256 Bit | 320 Bit |
Memory Clock Speed | 1502 MHz | 1900 MHz (3800 data rate) |
Memory Bandwidth | 192.3 GB/s GB/s | 152.0 GB/s GB/s |
Resizable BAR | N/A | N/A |
Power & EfficiencyPower consumption, efficiency, and additional power requirements. |
||
Power Consumption (TDP) | 150 W | 219 W |
Power Efficiency | 7.21 | 3.18 |
Manufacturing Process | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Supplementary Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin | 2x 6-pin |
Here are some of the closest competitors to this GPU. Compare their power consumption, efficiency, and additional power requirements.
Here are some of the closest competitors to this GPU. Compare their power consumption, efficiency, and additional power requirements.