Explore the complete details of Quadro P3200 Max-Q VS GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, including specs, performance benchmarks
GeForce RTX 5090
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4090
NVIDIAQuadro K5000
NVIDIAIris Xe Graphics G7
IntelGraphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)
IntelGeForce GTX 570
NVIDIAGraphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)
UnknownGeForce GTX 750 Ti
NVIDIARadeon RX 460 Mobile
AMDGRID M60-8Q
NVIDIARadeon HD 7850
AMDRadeon HD 8970M
AMDThe Quadro P3200 Max-Q GPU by NVIDIA. features a Pascal (2016−2021) architecture. with 1792 CUDA cores. and a boost clock of 1404 MHz MHz. It offers GDDR5 memory with 6 GB GB capacity and a 192 Bit-bit interface. delivering a bandwidth of 168.3 GB/s GB/s. With a power consumption (TDP) of 75W. it supports DirectX 12 (12_1), Vulkan 1.2.131 for enhanced performance.
The Quadro P3200 Max-Q GPU by NVIDIA. features a Pascal (2016−2021) architecture. with 1792 CUDA cores. and a boost clock of 1404 MHz MHz. It offers GDDR5 memory with 6 GB GB capacity and a 192 Bit-bit interface. delivering a bandwidth of 168.3 GB/s GB/s. With a power consumption (TDP) of 75W. it supports DirectX 12 (12_1), Vulkan 1.2.131 for enhanced performance.
Basic details about the Quadro P3200 Max-Q, including manufacturer, ranking, and release date.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| Ranking | 253 | 289 |
| Popularity Rank | not in top-100 | 95 |
| Architecture | Pascal (2016−2021) | Turing (2018−2022) |
| GPU code name | GP104 | TU116 |
| Market Segmente | Mobile workstation | Laptop |
| Length - Width | N/A - N/A | N/A - N/A |
| Release Date | 21 February 2018 | 23 April 2020 |
PerformanceDetails on clock speeds, cores, and floating-point processing power of Quadro P3200 Max-Q VS GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile. |
||
| Core Clock Speed | 1139 MHz | 1350 MHz |
| Boost Clock Speed | 1404 MHz | 1485 MHz |
| Floating Point Processing Power | 5.032 TFLOPS | 3.041 TFLOPS |
| No of Transistors | 7,200 million | 6,600 million |
| CUDA Cores | 1792 | 1024 |
| Ray Tracing Cores | N/A | N/A |
| Tensor Cores | N/A | N/A |
| Texture Fill Rate | 157.2 | 95.04 |
| ROPs | 64 | 32 |
Available display connectors and API compatibility for enhanced performance.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| HDMI | N/A | N/A |
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.5 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2.140 |
| CUDA | 6.1 | 7.5 |
| DLSS | N/A | N/A |
| TMUs | 112 | 64 |
Memory & BusInformation on memory type, capacity, and bandwidth to evaluate data processing power. |
||
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Maximum RAM | 6 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Bus Width | 192 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory Clock Speed | 1753 MHz | 1500 MHz |
| Memory Bandwidth | 168.3 GB/s GB/s | 192.0 GB/s GB/s |
| Resizable BAR | N/A | N/A |
Power & EfficiencyPower consumption, efficiency, and additional power requirements. |
||
| Power Consumption (TDP) | 75 W | 50 W |
| Power Efficiency | 21.46 | 27.51 |
| Manufacturing Process | 16 nm | 12 nm |
| Supplementary Power Connectors | None | N/A |
Here are some of the closest competitors to this GPU. Compare their power consumption, efficiency, and additional power requirements.
Here are some of the closest competitors to this GPU. Compare their power consumption, efficiency, and additional power requirements.