Explore the complete details of Radeon Instinct MI25 VS GeForce RTX 4060, including specs, performance benchmarks
GeForce RTX 5090
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4090
NVIDIAQuadro K5000
NVIDIAIris Xe Graphics G7
IntelGraphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)
IntelGeForce GTX 570
NVIDIAGraphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)
UnknownGeForce GTX 750 Ti
NVIDIARadeon RX 460 Mobile
AMDRadeon HD 7850
AMDGRID M60-8Q
NVIDIARadeon HD 8970M
AMDThe Radeon Instinct MI25 GPU by AMD. features a GCN 5.0 (2017−2020) architecture. with 4096 ×2 CUDA cores. and a boost clock of 1500 MHz MHz. It offers HBM2 memory with 16 GB ×2 GB capacity and a 2048 Bit ×2-bit interface. delivering a bandwidth of 436.2 GB/s ×2 GB/s. With a power consumption (TDP) of 300W. it supports DirectX 12 (12_1), Vulkan 1.1.125 for enhanced performance.
The Radeon Instinct MI25 GPU by AMD. features a GCN 5.0 (2017−2020) architecture. with 4096 ×2 CUDA cores. and a boost clock of 1500 MHz MHz. It offers HBM2 memory with 16 GB ×2 GB capacity and a 2048 Bit ×2-bit interface. delivering a bandwidth of 436.2 GB/s ×2 GB/s. With a power consumption (TDP) of 300W. it supports DirectX 12 (12_1), Vulkan 1.1.125 for enhanced performance.
Basic details about the Radeon Instinct MI25, including manufacturer, ranking, and release date.
![]() |
|
|
---|---|---|
Manufacturer | AMD | NVIDIA |
Ranking | 433 | 79 |
Popularity Rank | not in top-100 | 1 |
Architecture | GCN 5.0 (2017−2020) | Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) |
GPU code name | Vega 10 | AD107 |
Market Segmente | Workstation | Desktop |
Length - Width | 267 mm - 2-slot | 240 mm - 2-slot |
Release Date | 27 June 2017 | 18 May 2023 |
PerformanceDetails on clock speeds, cores, and floating-point processing power of Radeon Instinct MI25 VS GeForce RTX 4060. |
||
Core Clock Speed | 1400 MHz | 1830 MHz |
Boost Clock Speed | 1500 MHz | 2460 MHz |
Floating Point Processing Power | 12.29 TFLOPS ×2 | 15.11 TFLOPS |
No of Transistors | 12,500 million | 18,900 million |
CUDA Cores | 4096 ×2 | 3072 |
Ray Tracing Cores | N/A | 24 |
Tensor Cores | N/A | 96 |
Texture Fill Rate | 384.0 ×2 | 236.2 |
ROPs | 64 ×2 | 48 |
Available display connectors and API compatibility for enhanced performance.
![]() |
|
|
---|---|---|
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x8 |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a |
HDMI | N/A | 1 |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.8 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 3.0 |
Vulkan | 1.1.125 | 1.3 |
CUDA | N/A | 8.9 |
DLSS | N/A | 1 |
TMUs | 256 ×2 | 96 |
Memory & BusInformation on memory type, capacity, and bandwidth to evaluate data processing power. |
||
Memory Type | HBM2 | GDDR6 |
Maximum RAM | 16 GB ×2 | 8 GB |
Memory Bus Width | 2048 Bit ×2 | 128 Bit |
Memory Clock Speed | 852 MHz | 2125 MHz |
Memory Bandwidth | 436.2 GB/s ×2 GB/s | 272.0 GB/s GB/s |
Resizable BAR | N/A | 1 |
Power & EfficiencyPower consumption, efficiency, and additional power requirements. |
||
Power Consumption (TDP) | 300 W | 115 W |
Power Efficiency | 2.74 | 30.81 |
Manufacturing Process | 14 nm | 5 nm |
Supplementary Power Connectors | 2x 8-pin | 1x 12-pin |
Here are some of the closest competitors to this GPU. Compare their power consumption, efficiency, and additional power requirements.
Here are some of the closest competitors to this GPU. Compare their power consumption, efficiency, and additional power requirements.