Explore the complete details of Radeon Pro WX 8200 VS Iris Xe Graphics G7, including specs, performance benchmarks
GeForce RTX 5090
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4090
NVIDIAQuadro K5000
NVIDIAIris Xe Graphics G7
IntelGraphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)
IntelGeForce GTX 570
NVIDIAGraphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)
UnknownGeForce GTX 750 Ti
NVIDIARadeon RX 460 Mobile
AMDGRID M60-8Q
NVIDIARadeon HD 7850
AMDRadeon HD 8970M
AMDThe Radeon Pro WX 8200 GPU by AMD. features a GCN 5.0 (2017−2020) architecture. with 3584 CUDA cores. and a boost clock of 1500 MHz MHz. It offers HBM2 memory with 8 GB GB capacity and a 2048 Bit-bit interface. delivering a bandwidth of 512.0 GB/s GB/s. With a power consumption (TDP) of 230W. it supports DirectX 12 (12_1), Vulkan 1.1.125 for enhanced performance.
The Radeon Pro WX 8200 GPU by AMD. features a GCN 5.0 (2017−2020) architecture. with 3584 CUDA cores. and a boost clock of 1500 MHz MHz. It offers HBM2 memory with 8 GB GB capacity and a 2048 Bit-bit interface. delivering a bandwidth of 512.0 GB/s GB/s. With a power consumption (TDP) of 230W. it supports DirectX 12 (12_1), Vulkan 1.1.125 for enhanced performance.
Basic details about the Radeon Pro WX 8200, including manufacturer, ranking, and release date.
![]() |
![]() |
|
---|---|---|
Manufacturer | AMD | Intel |
Ranking | 195 | 476 |
Popularity Rank | not in top-100 | 23 |
Architecture | GCN 5.0 (2017−2020) | Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022) |
GPU code name | Vega 10 | Tiger Lake Xe |
Market Segmente | Workstation | Laptop |
Length - Width | 267 mm - 2-slot | N/A - N/A |
Release Date | 13 August 2018 | 15 August 2020 |
PerformanceDetails on clock speeds, cores, and floating-point processing power of Radeon Pro WX 8200 VS Iris Xe Graphics G7. |
||
Core Clock Speed | 1200 MHz | N/A |
Boost Clock Speed | 1500 MHz | N/A |
Floating Point Processing Power | 10.75 TFLOPS | N/A |
No of Transistors | 12,500 million | N/A |
CUDA Cores | 3584 | 96 |
Ray Tracing Cores | N/A | N/A |
Tensor Cores | N/A | N/A |
Texture Fill Rate | 336.0 | N/A |
ROPs | 64 | N/A |
Available display connectors and API compatibility for enhanced performance.
![]() |
![]() |
|
---|---|---|
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | N/A |
Display Connectors | 4x mini-DisplayPort | N/A |
HDMI | N/A | N/A |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | DirectX 12_1 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | N/A |
OpenGL | 4.6 | N/A |
OpenCL | 2.0 | N/A |
Vulkan | 1.1.125 | N/A |
CUDA | N/A | N/A |
DLSS | N/A | N/A |
TMUs | 224 | N/A |
Memory & BusInformation on memory type, capacity, and bandwidth to evaluate data processing power. |
||
Memory Type | HBM2 | DDR4 |
Maximum RAM | 8 GB | N/A |
Memory Bus Width | 2048 Bit | N/A |
Memory Clock Speed | 1000 MHz | N/A |
Memory Bandwidth | 512.0 GB/s GB/s | N/A GB/s |
Resizable BAR | N/A | N/A |
Power & EfficiencyPower consumption, efficiency, and additional power requirements. |
||
Power Consumption (TDP) | 230 W | N/A W |
Power Efficiency | 10.02 | N/A |
Manufacturing Process | 14 nm | 10 nm |
Supplementary Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | N/A |
Here are some of the closest competitors to this GPU. Compare their power consumption, efficiency, and additional power requirements.
Here are some of the closest competitors to this GPU. Compare their power consumption, efficiency, and additional power requirements.