Explore the complete details of RTX 2000 Ada Generation VS GeForce GTX 780, including specs, performance benchmarks
GeForce RTX 4090
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 5090 D
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 5080
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4080
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4080 SUPER
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 5070 Ti
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4070 Ti
NVIDIARadeon RX 7900 XTX
AMDRTX 5000 Ada Generation
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3090 Ti
NVIDIAThe RTX 2000 Ada Generation GPU by NVIDIA. features a Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) architecture. with 2816 CUDA cores. and a boost clock of 2130 MHz MHz. It offers GDDR6 memory with 16 GB GB capacity and a 128 Bit-bit interface. delivering a bandwidth of 256.0 GB/s GB/s. With a power consumption (TDP) of 70W. it supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), Vulkan 1.3, DLSS 1 for enhanced performance.
The RTX 2000 Ada Generation GPU by NVIDIA. features a Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) architecture. with 2816 CUDA cores. and a boost clock of 2130 MHz MHz. It offers GDDR6 memory with 16 GB GB capacity and a 128 Bit-bit interface. delivering a bandwidth of 256.0 GB/s GB/s. With a power consumption (TDP) of 70W. it supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), Vulkan 1.3, DLSS 1 for enhanced performance.
Basic details about the RTX 2000 Ada Generation, including manufacturer, ranking, and release date.
|
|
|
---|---|---|
Manufacturer | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
Ranking | 83 | 282 |
Popularity Rank | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Architecture | Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) | Kepler (2012−2018) |
GPU code name | AD107 | GK110 |
Market Segmente | Workstation | Desktop |
Length - Width | 168 mm - 2-slot | 267 mm - 2-slot |
Release Date | 12 February 2024 | 23 May 2013 |
PerformanceDetails on clock speeds, cores, and floating-point processing power of RTX 2000 Ada Generation VS GeForce GTX 780. |
||
Core Clock Speed | 1620 MHz | 863 MHz |
Boost Clock Speed | 2130 MHz | 900 MHz |
Floating Point Processing Power | 12 TFLOPS | 4.156 TFLOPS |
No of Transistors | 18,900 million | 7,080 million |
CUDA Cores | 2816 | 2304 |
Ray Tracing Cores | 22 | N/A |
Tensor Cores | 88 | N/A |
Texture Fill Rate | 187.4 | 173.2 |
ROPs | 48 | 48 |
Available display connectors and API compatibility for enhanced performance.
|
|
|
---|---|---|
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Display Connectors | 4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a | One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI, One DisplayPort |
HDMI | N/A | 1 |
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | N/A |
Shader Model | 6.8 | N/A |
OpenGL | 4.6 | N/A |
OpenCL | 3.0 | N/A |
Vulkan | 1.3 | N/A |
CUDA | 8.9 | N/A |
DLSS | 1 | N/A |
TMUs | 88 | 192 |
Memory & BusInformation on memory type, capacity, and bandwidth to evaluate data processing power. |
||
Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM | 16 GB | 3 GB |
Memory Bus Width | 128 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory Clock Speed | 2000 MHz | 1502 MHz |
Memory Bandwidth | 256.0 GB/s GB/s | 288.4 GB/s GB/s |
Resizable BAR | 1 | N/A |
Power & EfficiencyPower consumption, efficiency, and additional power requirements. |
||
Power Consumption (TDP) | 70 W | 250 W |
Power Efficiency | 43.89 | 5.64 |
Manufacturing Process | 5 nm | 28 nm |
Supplementary Power Connectors | None | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Here are some of the closest competitors to this GPU. Compare their power consumption, efficiency, and additional power requirements.
Here are some of the closest competitors to this GPU. Compare their power consumption, efficiency, and additional power requirements.