Explore the complete details of Tesla K80 VS GeForce GTX 750 Ti, including specs, performance benchmarks
GeForce RTX 5090
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4090
NVIDIAQuadro K5000
NVIDIAIris Xe Graphics G7
IntelGraphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)
IntelGeForce GTX 570
NVIDIAGraphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)
UnknownGeForce GTX 750 Ti
NVIDIARadeon RX 460 Mobile
AMDRadeon HD 7850
AMDGRID M60-8Q
NVIDIARadeon HD 8970M
AMDThe Tesla K80 GPU by NVIDIA. features a Kepler 2.0 (2013−2015) architecture. with 2496 ×2 CUDA cores. and a boost clock of 824 MHz MHz. It offers GDDR5 memory with 12 GB ×2 GB capacity and a 384 Bit ×2-bit interface. delivering a bandwidth of 240.6 GB/s ×2 GB/s. With a power consumption (TDP) of 300W. it supports DirectX 12 (11_1), Vulkan 1.1.126 for enhanced performance.
The Tesla K80 GPU by NVIDIA. features a Kepler 2.0 (2013−2015) architecture. with 2496 ×2 CUDA cores. and a boost clock of 824 MHz MHz. It offers GDDR5 memory with 12 GB ×2 GB capacity and a 384 Bit ×2-bit interface. delivering a bandwidth of 240.6 GB/s ×2 GB/s. With a power consumption (TDP) of 300W. it supports DirectX 12 (11_1), Vulkan 1.1.126 for enhanced performance.
Basic details about the Tesla K80, including manufacturer, ranking, and release date.
|
|
|
---|---|---|
Manufacturer | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
Ranking | 432 | 480 |
Popularity Rank | not in top-100 | 27 |
Architecture | Kepler 2.0 (2013−2015) | Maxwell (2014−2017) |
GPU code name | GK210 | GM107 |
Market Segmente | Workstation | Desktop |
Length - Width | 267 mm - 2-slot | 145 mm - 1-slot |
Release Date | 17 November 2014 | 18 February 2014 |
PerformanceDetails on clock speeds, cores, and floating-point processing power of Tesla K80 VS GeForce GTX 750 Ti. |
||
Core Clock Speed | 562 MHz | 1020 MHz |
Boost Clock Speed | 824 MHz | 1085 MHz |
Floating Point Processing Power | 4.113 TFLOPS ×2 | 1.389 TFLOPS |
No of Transistors | 7,100 million | 1,870 million |
CUDA Cores | 2496 ×2 | 640 |
Ray Tracing Cores | N/A | N/A |
Tensor Cores | N/A | N/A |
Texture Fill Rate | 171.4 ×2 | 43.40 |
ROPs | 48 ×2 | 16 |
Available display connectors and API compatibility for enhanced performance.
|
|
|
---|---|---|
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Display Connectors | No outputs | One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One mini-HDMI |
HDMI | N/A | 1 |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | N/A |
Shader Model | 5.1 | N/A |
OpenGL | 4.6 | N/A |
OpenCL | 1.2 | N/A |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | N/A |
CUDA | 3.7 | N/A |
DLSS | N/A | N/A |
TMUs | 208 ×2 | 40 |
Memory & BusInformation on memory type, capacity, and bandwidth to evaluate data processing power. |
||
Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM | 12 GB ×2 | 4 GB |
Memory Bus Width | 384 Bit ×2 | 128 Bit |
Memory Clock Speed | 1253 MHz | 5.4 GB/s |
Memory Bandwidth | 240.6 GB/s ×2 GB/s | 86.4 GB/s GB/s |
Resizable BAR | N/A | N/A |
Power & EfficiencyPower consumption, efficiency, and additional power requirements. |
||
Power Consumption (TDP) | 300 W | 60 W |
Power Efficiency | 2.76 | 11.53 |
Manufacturing Process | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Supplementary Power Connectors | 1x 8-pin | None |
Here are some of the closest competitors to this GPU. Compare their power consumption, efficiency, and additional power requirements.
Here are some of the closest competitors to this GPU. Compare their power consumption, efficiency, and additional power requirements.