Explore the complete details of GeForce GTX 260 VS GeForce MX110, including specs, performance benchmarks
GeForce RTX 5090
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4090
NVIDIAQuadro K5000
NVIDIAIris Xe Graphics G7
IntelGraphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)
IntelGeForce GTX 570
NVIDIAGraphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)
UnknownGeForce GTX 750 Ti
NVIDIARadeon RX 460 Mobile
AMDGRID M60-8Q
NVIDIARadeon HD 7850
AMDRadeon HD 8970M
AMDThe GeForce GTX 260 GPU by NVIDIA. features a Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013) architecture. with 192 CUDA cores. It offers GDDR3 memory with 896 MB GB capacity and a 448 Bit-bit interface. delivering a bandwidth of 111.9 GB/s GB/s. With a power consumption (TDP) of 182W. it supports DirectX 11.1 (10_0), Vulkan N/A for enhanced performance.
The GeForce GTX 260 GPU by NVIDIA. features a Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013) architecture. with 192 CUDA cores. It offers GDDR3 memory with 896 MB GB capacity and a 448 Bit-bit interface. delivering a bandwidth of 111.9 GB/s GB/s. With a power consumption (TDP) of 182W. it supports DirectX 11.1 (10_0), Vulkan N/A for enhanced performance.
Basic details about the GeForce GTX 260, including manufacturer, ranking, and release date.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| Ranking | 793 | 754 |
| Popularity Rank | not in top-100 | 92 |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013) | Maxwell (2014−2017) |
| GPU code name | GT200 | GM108S |
| Market Segmente | Desktop | Laptop |
| Length - Width | 267 mm - 2-slot | N/A - N/A |
| Release Date | 16 June 2008 | 17 November 2017 |
PerformanceDetails on clock speeds, cores, and floating-point processing power of GeForce GTX 260 VS GeForce MX110. |
||
| Core Clock Speed | 576 MHz | 978 MHz |
| Boost Clock Speed | N/A | 1006 MHz |
| Floating Point Processing Power | 0.4769 TFLOPS | 0.5151 TFLOPS |
| No of Transistors | 1,400 million | 1,020 million |
| CUDA Cores | 192 | 256 |
| Ray Tracing Cores | N/A | N/A |
| Tensor Cores | N/A | N/A |
| Texture Fill Rate | 36.86 | 16.10 |
| ROPs | 28 | 8 |
Available display connectors and API compatibility for enhanced performance.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x4 |
| Display Connectors | Dual Link DVIHDTV | Portable Device Dependent |
| HDMI | 1 | N/A |
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | N/A |
| Shader Model | 4.0 | N/A |
| OpenGL | 2.1 | N/A |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | N/A |
| Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
| CUDA | + | N/A |
| DLSS | N/A | N/A |
| TMUs | 64 | 16 |
Memory & BusInformation on memory type, capacity, and bandwidth to evaluate data processing power. |
||
| Memory Type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM | 896 MB | 2 GB |
| Memory Bus Width | 448 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory Clock Speed | 999 MHz | 1253 MHz |
| Memory Bandwidth | 111.9 GB/s GB/s | 40.1 GB/s GB/s |
| Resizable BAR | N/A | N/A |
Power & EfficiencyPower consumption, efficiency, and additional power requirements. |
||
| Power Consumption (TDP) | 182 W | 30 W |
| Power Efficiency | 1.19 | 8.42 |
| Manufacturing Process | 65 nm | 28 nm |
| Supplementary Power Connectors | 2x 6-pin | None |
Here are some of the closest competitors to this GPU. Compare their power consumption, efficiency, and additional power requirements.
Here are some of the closest competitors to this GPU. Compare their power consumption, efficiency, and additional power requirements.