Explore the complete details of HD Graphics 2500, including specs, performance benchmarks
The HD Graphics 2500 GPU by Intel. features a Generation 7.0 (2012−2013) architecture. with 48 CUDA cores. and a boost clock of 1150 MHz MHz. It offers System Shared memory with System Shared GB capacity and a System Shared-bit interface. it supports DirectX 11.1 (11_0), Vulkan 1.1.80 for enhanced performance.
Basic details about the HD Graphics 2500, including manufacturer, ranking, and release date.
Title | HD Graphics 2500 |
---|---|
Manufacturer | Intel |
Ranking | 1221 |
Popularity Rank | not in top-100 |
Architecture | Generation 7.0 (2012−2013) |
GPU code name | Ivy Bridge GT1 |
Market Segmente | Desktop |
Length - Width | N/A - IGP |
Release Date | 1 April 2012 |
Launch Price | $N/A |
Details on clock speeds, cores, and floating-point processing power of HD Graphics 2500.
Core Clock Speed | 650 MHz |
---|---|
Boost Clock Speed | 1150 MHz |
Floating Point Processing Power | 0.1104 TFLOPS |
No of Transistors | 392 million |
CUDA Cores | 48 |
Ray Tracing Cores | N/A |
Tensor Cores | N/A |
Texture Fill Rate | 6.900 |
ROPs | 1 |
Available display connectors and API compatibility for enhanced performance.
Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
---|---|
Display Connectors | No outputs |
HDMI | N/A |
DirectX | 11.1 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.0 |
OpenGL | 4.0 |
OpenCL | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.80 |
CUDA | N/A |
DLSS | N/A |
TMUs | 6 |
Information on memory type, capacity, and bandwidth to evaluate data processing power.
Memory Type | System Shared |
---|---|
Maximum RAM | System Shared |
Memory Bus Width | System Shared |
Memory Clock Speed | System Shared |
Memory Bandwidth | N/A GB/s |
Resizable BAR | N/A |
Power consumption, efficiency, and additional power requirements.
Power Consumption (TDP) | 0 W |
---|---|
Power Efficiency | N/A |
Manufacturing Process | 22 nm |
Supplementary Power Connectors | N/A |
Here are some of the closest competitors to this GPU. Compare their power consumption, efficiency, and additional power requirements.
Here are some of the closest competitors to this GPU. Compare their power consumption, efficiency, and additional power requirements.