Explore the complete details of Iris Plus Graphics 645, including specs, performance benchmarks
The Iris Plus Graphics 645 GPU by Intel. features a Generation 9.5 (2016−2020) architecture. with 384 CUDA cores. and a boost clock of 1050 MHz MHz. It offers System Shared memory with System Shared GB capacity and a System Shared-bit interface. With a power consumption (TDP) of 15W.
Basic details about the Iris Plus Graphics 645, including manufacturer, ranking, and release date.
Title | Iris Plus Graphics 645 |
---|---|
Manufacturer | Intel |
Ranking | 695 |
Popularity Rank | not in top-100 |
Architecture | Generation 9.5 (2016−2020) |
GPU code name | Coffee Lake GT3e |
Market Segmente | Laptop |
Length - Width | N/A - N/A |
Release Date | 7 October 2019 |
Launch Price | $N/A |
Details on clock speeds, cores, and floating-point processing power of Iris Plus Graphics 645.
Core Clock Speed | 300 MHz |
---|---|
Boost Clock Speed | 1050 MHz |
Floating Point Processing Power | 0.8064 TFLOPS |
No of Transistors | N/A |
CUDA Cores | 384 |
Ray Tracing Cores | N/A |
Tensor Cores | N/A |
Texture Fill Rate | 50.40 |
ROPs | 6 |
Available display connectors and API compatibility for enhanced performance.
Interface | Ring Bus |
---|---|
Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent |
HDMI | N/A |
DirectX | N/A |
Shader Model | N/A |
OpenGL | N/A |
OpenCL | N/A |
Vulkan | N/A |
CUDA | N/A |
DLSS | N/A |
TMUs | 48 |
Information on memory type, capacity, and bandwidth to evaluate data processing power.
Memory Type | System Shared |
---|---|
Maximum RAM | System Shared |
Memory Bus Width | System Shared |
Memory Clock Speed | System Shared |
Memory Bandwidth | N/A GB/s |
Resizable BAR | N/A |
Power consumption, efficiency, and additional power requirements.
Power Consumption (TDP) | 15 W |
---|---|
Power Efficiency | 20.82 |
Manufacturing Process | 14 nm+++ |
Supplementary Power Connectors | N/A |
Here are some of the closest competitors to this GPU. Compare their power consumption, efficiency, and additional power requirements.
Here are some of the closest competitors to this GPU. Compare their power consumption, efficiency, and additional power requirements.