Explore the complete details of M1 8-Core GPU VS Quadro M2000, including specs, performance benchmarks
GeForce RTX 5090
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4090
NVIDIAQuadro K5000
NVIDIAIris Xe Graphics G7
IntelGraphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)
IntelGeForce GTX 570
NVIDIAGraphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)
UnknownGeForce GTX 750 Ti
NVIDIARadeon RX 460 Mobile
AMDGRID M60-8Q
NVIDIARadeon HD 7850
AMDRadeon HD 8970M
AMDThe M1 8-Core GPU GPU by Apple. with 8 CUDA cores.
The M1 8-Core GPU GPU by Apple. with 8 CUDA cores.
Basic details about the M1 8-Core GPU, including manufacturer, ranking, and release date.
|
|
|
---|---|---|
Manufacturer | Apple | NVIDIA |
Ranking | 394 | 474 |
Popularity Rank | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Architecture | N/A | Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019) |
GPU code name | N/A | GM206 |
Market Segmente | Laptop | Workstation |
Length - Width | N/A - N/A | 201 mm - 1" (2.5 cm) |
Release Date | 10 November 2020 | 8 April 2016 |
PerformanceDetails on clock speeds, cores, and floating-point processing power of M1 8-Core GPU VS Quadro M2000. |
||
Core Clock Speed | 1278 MHz | 796 MHz |
Boost Clock Speed | N/A | 1163 MHz |
Floating Point Processing Power | N/A | 1.786 TFLOPS |
No of Transistors | N/A | 2,940 million |
CUDA Cores | 8 | 768 |
Ray Tracing Cores | N/A | N/A |
Tensor Cores | N/A | N/A |
Texture Fill Rate | N/A | 55.82 |
ROPs | N/A | 32 |
Available display connectors and API compatibility for enhanced performance.
|
|
|
---|---|---|
Interface | N/A | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Display Connectors | N/A | 4x DisplayPort |
HDMI | N/A | N/A |
DirectX | N/A | N/A |
Shader Model | N/A | N/A |
OpenGL | N/A | N/A |
OpenCL | N/A | N/A |
Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
CUDA | N/A | N/A |
DLSS | N/A | N/A |
TMUs | N/A | 48 |
Memory & BusInformation on memory type, capacity, and bandwidth to evaluate data processing power. |
||
Memory Type | N/A | 128 Bit |
Maximum RAM | N/A | 4 GB |
Memory Bus Width | N/A | 128 Bit |
Memory Clock Speed | N/A | 1653 MHz |
Memory Bandwidth | N/A GB/s | Up to 106 GB/s GB/s |
Resizable BAR | N/A | N/A |
Power & EfficiencyPower consumption, efficiency, and additional power requirements. |
||
Power Consumption (TDP) | N/A W | 75 W |
Power Efficiency | N/A | 9.46 |
Manufacturing Process | 5 nm | 28 nm |
Supplementary Power Connectors | N/A | None |
Here are some of the closest competitors to this GPU. Compare their power consumption, efficiency, and additional power requirements.
Here are some of the closest competitors to this GPU. Compare their power consumption, efficiency, and additional power requirements.