Explore the complete details of Quadro FX 2500M, including specs, performance benchmarks
The Quadro FX 2500M GPU by NVIDIA. features a Curie (2003−2013) architecture. with 32 CUDA cores. and a boost clock of 500 MHz MHz. It offers GDDR3 memory with 512 MB GB capacity and a 256 Bit-bit interface. delivering a bandwidth of 38.4 GB/s GB/s. With a power consumption (TDP) of 45W. it supports DirectX 9.0c (9_3), Vulkan N/A for enhanced performance.
Basic details about the Quadro FX 2500M, including manufacturer, ranking, and release date.
Title | Quadro FX 2500M |
---|---|
Manufacturer | NVIDIA |
Ranking | 1260 |
Popularity Rank | not in top-100 |
Architecture | Curie (2003−2013) |
GPU code name | G71 |
Market Segmente | Mobile workstation |
Length - Width | N/A - N/A |
Release Date | 29 September 2005 |
Launch Price | $N/A |
Details on clock speeds, cores, and floating-point processing power of Quadro FX 2500M.
Core Clock Speed | 500 MHz |
---|---|
Boost Clock Speed | 500 MHz |
Floating Point Processing Power | N/A |
No of Transistors | 278 million |
CUDA Cores | 32 |
Ray Tracing Cores | N/A |
Tensor Cores | N/A |
Texture Fill Rate | 12.00 |
ROPs | 16 |
Available display connectors and API compatibility for enhanced performance.
Interface | MXM-III |
---|---|
Display Connectors | No outputs |
HDMI | N/A |
DirectX | 9.0c (9_3) |
Shader Model | 3.0 |
OpenGL | 2.1 |
OpenCL | N/A |
Vulkan | N/A |
CUDA | N/A |
DLSS | N/A |
TMUs | 24 |
Information on memory type, capacity, and bandwidth to evaluate data processing power.
Memory Type | GDDR3 |
---|---|
Maximum RAM | 512 MB |
Memory Bus Width | 256 Bit |
Memory Clock Speed | 600 MHz |
Memory Bandwidth | 38.4 GB/s GB/s |
Resizable BAR | N/A |
Power consumption, efficiency, and additional power requirements.
Power Consumption (TDP) | 45 W |
---|---|
Power Efficiency | 0.86 |
Manufacturing Process | 90 nm |
Supplementary Power Connectors | N/A |
Here are some of the closest competitors to this GPU. Compare their power consumption, efficiency, and additional power requirements.
Here are some of the closest competitors to this GPU. Compare their power consumption, efficiency, and additional power requirements.