Explore the complete details of Radeon 625 VS GeForce GTX 1650, including specs, performance benchmarks
GeForce RTX 5090
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4090
NVIDIAQuadro K5000
NVIDIAIris Xe Graphics G7
IntelGraphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)
IntelGeForce GTX 570
NVIDIAGraphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)
UnknownGeForce GTX 750 Ti
NVIDIARadeon RX 460 Mobile
AMDGRID M60-8Q
NVIDIARadeon HD 7850
AMDRadeon HD 8970M
AMDThe Radeon 625 GPU by AMD. features a GCN 3.0 (2014−2019) architecture. with 384 CUDA cores. and a boost clock of 1024 MHz MHz. It offers DDR3 memory with 2 GB GB capacity and a 64 Bit-bit interface. delivering a bandwidth of 14.4 GB/s GB/s. With a power consumption (TDP) of 50W. it supports DirectX 12 (12_0), Vulkan 1.2.131 for enhanced performance.
The Radeon 625 GPU by AMD. features a GCN 3.0 (2014−2019) architecture. with 384 CUDA cores. and a boost clock of 1024 MHz MHz. It offers DDR3 memory with 2 GB GB capacity and a 64 Bit-bit interface. delivering a bandwidth of 14.4 GB/s GB/s. With a power consumption (TDP) of 50W. it supports DirectX 12 (12_0), Vulkan 1.2.131 for enhanced performance.
Basic details about the Radeon 625, including manufacturer, ranking, and release date.
![]() |
|
|
---|---|---|
Manufacturer | AMD | NVIDIA |
Ranking | 843 | 287 |
Popularity Rank | not in top-100 | 4 |
Architecture | GCN 3.0 (2014−2019) | Turing (2018−2022) |
GPU code name | Polaris 24 | TU117 |
Market Segmente | Laptop | Desktop |
Length - Width | N/A - N/A | 229 mm - 2-slot |
Release Date | 13 May 2019 | 23 April 2019 |
PerformanceDetails on clock speeds, cores, and floating-point processing power of Radeon 625 VS GeForce GTX 1650. |
||
Core Clock Speed | 730 MHz | 1485 MHz |
Boost Clock Speed | 1024 MHz | 1665 MHz |
Floating Point Processing Power | 0.7864 TFLOPS | 2.984 TFLOPS |
No of Transistors | 1,550 million | 4,700 million |
CUDA Cores | 384 | 896 |
Ray Tracing Cores | N/A | N/A |
Tensor Cores | N/A | N/A |
Texture Fill Rate | 24.58 | 93.24 |
ROPs | 8 | 32 |
Available display connectors and API compatibility for enhanced performance.
![]() |
|
|
---|---|---|
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
HDMI | N/A | 1 |
DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 6.3 | 6.5 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | N/A | 7.5 |
DLSS | N/A | N/A |
TMUs | 24 | 56 |
Memory & BusInformation on memory type, capacity, and bandwidth to evaluate data processing power. |
||
Memory Type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM | 2 GB | 4 GB |
Memory Bus Width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory Clock Speed | 900 MHz | 2000 MHz |
Memory Bandwidth | 14.4 GB/s GB/s | 128.0 GB/s GB/s |
Resizable BAR | N/A | N/A |
Power & EfficiencyPower consumption, efficiency, and additional power requirements. |
||
Power Consumption (TDP) | 50 W | 75 W |
Power Efficiency | 3.85 | 18.54 |
Manufacturing Process | 28 nm | 12 nm |
Supplementary Power Connectors | None | None |
Here are some of the closest competitors to this GPU. Compare their power consumption, efficiency, and additional power requirements.
Here are some of the closest competitors to this GPU. Compare their power consumption, efficiency, and additional power requirements.