Explore the complete details of Radeon 680M VS GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, including specs, performance benchmarks
GeForce RTX 5090
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4090
NVIDIAQuadro K5000
NVIDIAIris Xe Graphics G7
IntelGraphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)
IntelGeForce GTX 570
NVIDIAGraphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)
UnknownGeForce GTX 750 Ti
NVIDIARadeon RX 460 Mobile
AMDRadeon HD 7850
AMDGRID M60-8Q
NVIDIARadeon HD 8970M
AMDThe Radeon 680M GPU by AMD. features a RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024) architecture. with 768 CUDA cores. and a boost clock of 2200 MHz MHz. It offers System Shared memory with System Shared GB capacity and a System Shared-bit interface. With a power consumption (TDP) of 50W. it supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), Vulkan 1.3 for enhanced performance.
The Radeon 680M GPU by AMD. features a RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024) architecture. with 768 CUDA cores. and a boost clock of 2200 MHz MHz. It offers System Shared memory with System Shared GB capacity and a System Shared-bit interface. With a power consumption (TDP) of 50W. it supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), Vulkan 1.3 for enhanced performance.
Basic details about the Radeon 680M, including manufacturer, ranking, and release date.
![]() |
|
|
---|---|---|
Manufacturer | AMD | NVIDIA |
Ranking | 537 | 366 |
Popularity Rank | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Architecture | RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024) | Pascal (2016−2021) |
GPU code name | Rembrandt+ | GP107 |
Market Segmente | Laptop | Laptop |
Length - Width | N/A - N/A | N/A - N/A |
Release Date | 3 January 2023 | 3 January 2017 |
PerformanceDetails on clock speeds, cores, and floating-point processing power of Radeon 680M VS GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile. |
||
Core Clock Speed | 2000 MHz | 1493 MHz |
Boost Clock Speed | 2200 MHz | 1620 MHz |
Floating Point Processing Power | 3.379 TFLOPS | 2.488 TFLOPS |
No of Transistors | 13,100 million | 3,300 million |
CUDA Cores | 768 | 768 |
Ray Tracing Cores | 12 | N/A |
Tensor Cores | N/A | N/A |
Texture Fill Rate | 105.6 | 77.76 |
ROPs | 32 | 32 |
Available display connectors and API compatibility for enhanced performance.
![]() |
|
|
---|---|---|
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | No outputs |
HDMI | N/A | N/A |
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | N/A |
Shader Model | 6.7 | N/A |
OpenGL | 4.6 | N/A |
OpenCL | 2.0 | N/A |
Vulkan | 1.3 | N/A |
CUDA | N/A | N/A |
DLSS | N/A | N/A |
TMUs | 48 | 48 |
Memory & BusInformation on memory type, capacity, and bandwidth to evaluate data processing power. |
||
Memory Type | System Shared | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM | System Shared | 4 GB |
Memory Bus Width | System Shared | 128 Bit |
Memory Clock Speed | System Shared | 7 GB/s |
Memory Bandwidth | N/A GB/s | 112 GB/s GB/s |
Resizable BAR | N/A | N/A |
Power & EfficiencyPower consumption, efficiency, and additional power requirements. |
||
Power Consumption (TDP) | 50 W | 75 W |
Power Efficiency | 11.83 | 13.78 |
Manufacturing Process | 6 nm | 14 nm |
Supplementary Power Connectors | None | N/A |
Here are some of the closest competitors to this GPU. Compare their power consumption, efficiency, and additional power requirements.
Here are some of the closest competitors to this GPU. Compare their power consumption, efficiency, and additional power requirements.