Explore the complete details of Radeon HD 2600 PRO VS GeForce 8800 GT, including specs, performance benchmarks
GeForce RTX 5090
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4090
NVIDIAQuadro K5000
NVIDIAIris Xe Graphics G7
IntelGraphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)
IntelGeForce GTX 570
NVIDIAGraphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)
UnknownGeForce GTX 750 Ti
NVIDIARadeon RX 460 Mobile
AMDGRID M60-8Q
NVIDIARadeon HD 7850
AMDRadeon HD 8970M
AMDThe Radeon HD 2600 PRO GPU by ATI. features a TeraScale (2005−2013) architecture. with 120 CUDA cores. It offers DDR2 memory with 512 MB GB capacity and a 128 Bit-bit interface. delivering a bandwidth of 16 GB/s GB/s. With a power consumption (TDP) of 35W. it supports DirectX 10.0 (10_0), Vulkan N/A for enhanced performance.
The Radeon HD 2600 PRO GPU by ATI. features a TeraScale (2005−2013) architecture. with 120 CUDA cores. It offers DDR2 memory with 512 MB GB capacity and a 128 Bit-bit interface. delivering a bandwidth of 16 GB/s GB/s. With a power consumption (TDP) of 35W. it supports DirectX 10.0 (10_0), Vulkan N/A for enhanced performance.
Basic details about the Radeon HD 2600 PRO, including manufacturer, ranking, and release date.
![]() |
|
|
---|---|---|
Manufacturer | ATI | NVIDIA |
Ranking | 1266 | 1103 |
Popularity Rank | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Architecture | TeraScale (2005−2013) | Tesla (2006−2010) |
GPU code name | RV630 | G92 |
Market Segmente | Desktop | Desktop |
Length - Width | N/A - 1-slot | 229 mm - 1-slot |
Release Date | 28 June 2007 | 29 October 2007 |
PerformanceDetails on clock speeds, cores, and floating-point processing power of Radeon HD 2600 PRO VS GeForce 8800 GT. |
||
Core Clock Speed | 600 MHz | 600 MHz |
Boost Clock Speed | N/A | N/A |
Floating Point Processing Power | 0.144 TFLOPS | 0.336 TFLOPS |
No of Transistors | 390 million | 754 million |
CUDA Cores | 120 | 112 |
Ray Tracing Cores | N/A | N/A |
Tensor Cores | N/A | N/A |
Texture Fill Rate | 4.800 | 33.60 |
ROPs | 4 | 16 |
Available display connectors and API compatibility for enhanced performance.
![]() |
|
|
---|---|---|
Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video | Dual Link DVIHDTV |
HDMI | N/A | N/A |
DirectX | 10.0 (10_0) | N/A |
Shader Model | 4.0 | N/A |
OpenGL | 3.3 | N/A |
OpenCL | N/A | N/A |
Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
CUDA | N/A | N/A |
DLSS | N/A | N/A |
TMUs | 8 | 56 |
Memory & BusInformation on memory type, capacity, and bandwidth to evaluate data processing power. |
||
Memory Type | DDR2 | GDDR3 |
Maximum RAM | 512 MB | 512 MB |
Memory Bus Width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory Clock Speed | 500 MHz | 900 MHz |
Memory Bandwidth | 16 GB/s GB/s | 57.6 GB/s GB/s |
Resizable BAR | N/A | N/A |
Power & EfficiencyPower consumption, efficiency, and additional power requirements. |
||
Power Consumption (TDP) | 35 W | 105 W |
Power Efficiency | 1.09 | 0.66 |
Manufacturing Process | 65 nm | 65 nm |
Supplementary Power Connectors | None | 1x 6-pin |
Here are some of the closest competitors to this GPU. Compare their power consumption, efficiency, and additional power requirements.
Here are some of the closest competitors to this GPU. Compare their power consumption, efficiency, and additional power requirements.