Explore the complete details of Radeon HD 4200 VS GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16 GB, including specs, performance benchmarks
GeForce RTX 5090
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4090
NVIDIAQuadro K5000
NVIDIAIris Xe Graphics G7
IntelGraphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)
IntelGeForce GTX 570
NVIDIAGraphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)
UnknownGeForce GTX 750 Ti
NVIDIARadeon RX 460 Mobile
AMDGRID M60-8Q
NVIDIARadeon HD 7850
AMDRadeon HD 8970M
AMDThe Radeon HD 4200 GPU by ATI. features a TeraScale (2005−2013) architecture. with 40 CUDA cores. It offers System Shared memory with System Shared GB capacity and a System Shared-bit interface. it supports DirectX 10.1 (10_1), Vulkan N/A for enhanced performance.
The Radeon HD 4200 GPU by ATI. features a TeraScale (2005−2013) architecture. with 40 CUDA cores. It offers System Shared memory with System Shared GB capacity and a System Shared-bit interface. it supports DirectX 10.1 (10_1), Vulkan N/A for enhanced performance.
Basic details about the Radeon HD 4200, including manufacturer, ranking, and release date.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | ATI | NVIDIA |
| Ranking | 1385 | 48 |
| Popularity Rank | not in top-100 | 58 |
| Architecture | TeraScale (2005−2013) | Blackwell 2.0 (2025) |
| GPU code name | RS880 | GB206 |
| Market Segmente | Desktop | Desktop |
| Length - Width | N/A - IGP | 241 mm - 2-slot |
| Release Date | 1 August 2009 | 16 April 2025 |
PerformanceDetails on clock speeds, cores, and floating-point processing power of Radeon HD 4200 VS GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16 GB. |
||
| Core Clock Speed | 500 MHz | 2407 MHz |
| Boost Clock Speed | N/A | 2572 MHz |
| Floating Point Processing Power | 0.04 TFLOPS | 23.7 TFLOPS |
| No of Transistors | 181 million | 21,900 million |
| CUDA Cores | 40 | 4608 |
| Ray Tracing Cores | N/A | 36 |
| Tensor Cores | N/A | 144 |
| Texture Fill Rate | 2.000 | 370.4 |
| ROPs | 4 | 48 |
Available display connectors and API compatibility for enhanced performance.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | PCIe 5.0 x8 |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x HDMI 2.1b, 3x DisplayPort 2.1b |
| HDMI | N/A | 1 |
| DirectX | 10.1 (10_1) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Shader Model | 4.1 | 6.8 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.0 | 3.0 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.4 |
| CUDA | N/A | 12.0 |
| DLSS | N/A | 1 |
| TMUs | 4 | 144 |
Memory & BusInformation on memory type, capacity, and bandwidth to evaluate data processing power. |
||
| Memory Type | System Shared | GDDR7 |
| Maximum RAM | System Shared | 16 GB |
| Memory Bus Width | System Shared | 128 Bit |
| Memory Clock Speed | System Shared | 1750 MHz |
| Memory Bandwidth | N/A GB/s | 448.0 GB/s GB/s |
| Resizable BAR | N/A | 1 |
Power & EfficiencyPower consumption, efficiency, and additional power requirements. |
||
| Power Consumption (TDP) | N/A W | 180 W |
| Power Efficiency | N/A | 22.87 |
| Manufacturing Process | 55 nm | 5 nm |
| Supplementary Power Connectors | N/A | 1x 8-pin |
Here are some of the closest competitors to this GPU. Compare their power consumption, efficiency, and additional power requirements.
Here are some of the closest competitors to this GPU. Compare their power consumption, efficiency, and additional power requirements.