Explore the complete details of TITAN RTX VS GeForce GTX TITAN Z, including specs, performance benchmarks
GeForce RTX 4090
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 5090 D
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 5080
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4080
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4080 SUPER
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 5070 Ti
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4070 Ti
NVIDIARadeon RX 7900 XTX
AMDRTX 5000 Ada Generation
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3090 Ti
NVIDIAThe TITAN RTX GPU by NVIDIA. features a Turing (2018−2022) architecture. with 4608 CUDA cores. and a boost clock of 1770 MHz MHz. It offers GDDR6 memory with 24 GB GB capacity and a 384 Bit-bit interface. delivering a bandwidth of 672.0 GB/s GB/s. With a power consumption (TDP) of 280W. it supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_1), Vulkan 1.2.131, DLSS 1 for enhanced performance.
The TITAN RTX GPU by NVIDIA. features a Turing (2018−2022) architecture. with 4608 CUDA cores. and a boost clock of 1770 MHz MHz. It offers GDDR6 memory with 24 GB GB capacity and a 384 Bit-bit interface. delivering a bandwidth of 672.0 GB/s GB/s. With a power consumption (TDP) of 280W. it supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_1), Vulkan 1.2.131, DLSS 1 for enhanced performance.
Basic details about the TITAN RTX, including manufacturer, ranking, and release date.
|
|
|
---|---|---|
Manufacturer | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
Ranking | 72 | 259 |
Popularity Rank | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Architecture | Turing (2018−2022) | Kepler (2012−2018) |
GPU code name | TU102 | GK110B |
Market Segmente | Desktop | Desktop |
Length - Width | 267 mm - 2-slot | 267 mm - 3-slot |
Release Date | 18 December 2018 | 28 May 2014 |
PerformanceDetails on clock speeds, cores, and floating-point processing power of TITAN RTX VS GeForce GTX TITAN Z. |
||
Core Clock Speed | 1350 MHz | 705 MHz |
Boost Clock Speed | 1770 MHz | 876 MHz |
Floating Point Processing Power | 16.31 TFLOPS | 5.046 TFLOPS ×2 |
No of Transistors | 18,600 million | 7,080 million |
CUDA Cores | 4608 | 5760 ×2 |
Ray Tracing Cores | 72 | N/A |
Tensor Cores | 576 | N/A |
Texture Fill Rate | 509.8 | 210.2 ×2 |
ROPs | 96 | 48 ×2 |
Available display connectors and API compatibility for enhanced performance.
|
|
|
---|---|---|
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI, One DisplayPort |
HDMI | 1 | 1 |
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_1) | N/A |
Shader Model | 6.5 | N/A |
OpenGL | 4.6 | N/A |
OpenCL | 2.0 | N/A |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | N/A |
CUDA | 7.5 | N/A |
DLSS | 1 | N/A |
TMUs | 288 | 240 ×2 |
Memory & BusInformation on memory type, capacity, and bandwidth to evaluate data processing power. |
||
Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM | 24 GB | 12 GB ×2 |
Memory Bus Width | 384 Bit | 768-bit (384-bit per GPU) ×2 |
Memory Clock Speed | 1750 MHz | 7.0 GB/s |
Memory Bandwidth | 672.0 GB/s GB/s | 672 GB/s ×2 GB/s |
Resizable BAR | N/A | N/A |
Power & EfficiencyPower consumption, efficiency, and additional power requirements. |
||
Power Consumption (TDP) | 280 W | 375 W |
Power Efficiency | 11.92 | 4.19 |
Manufacturing Process | 12 nm | 28 nm |
Supplementary Power Connectors | 2x 8-pin | 2x 8-pin |
Here are some of the closest competitors to this GPU. Compare their power consumption, efficiency, and additional power requirements.
Here are some of the closest competitors to this GPU. Compare their power consumption, efficiency, and additional power requirements.