Radeon R7 M260 - Specs, Benchmarks

Explore the complete details of Radeon R7 M260, including specs, performance benchmarks

graphic card
Check Live Price on Amazon

Summary

The Radeon R7 M260 GPU by AMD. features a GCN 3.0 (2014−2019) architecture. with 384 CUDA cores. and a boost clock of 980 MHz MHz. It offers DDR3 memory with 4 GB GB capacity and a 128 Bit-bit interface. delivering a bandwidth of 14.4 GB/s GB/s.



Benchmark Performance

1.23

General Information

Basic details about the Radeon R7 M260, including manufacturer, ranking, and release date.

Title Radeon R7 M260
Manufacturer AMD
Ranking 1063
Popularity Rank not in top-100
Architecture GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code name Topaz
Market Segmente Laptop
Length - Width N/A - N/A
Release Date 11 June 2014
Launch Price $N/A

Performance

Details on clock speeds, cores, and floating-point processing power of Radeon R7 M260.

Core Clock Speed 940 MHz
Boost Clock Speed 980 MHz
Floating Point Processing Power 0.7526 TFLOPS
No of Transistors 1,550 million
CUDA Cores 384
Ray Tracing Cores N/A
Tensor Cores N/A
Texture Fill Rate 23.52
ROPs 8

Performance Score Comparison

GPU Cores

Connectivity & API Support

Available display connectors and API compatibility for enhanced performance.

Interface PCIe 3.0 x8
Display Connectors No outputs
HDMI N/A
DirectX N/A
Shader Model N/A
OpenGL N/A
OpenCL N/A
Vulkan N/A
CUDA N/A
DLSS N/A
TMUs 24

Memory & Bus

Information on memory type, capacity, and bandwidth to evaluate data processing power.

Memory Type DDR3
Maximum RAM 4 GB
Memory Bus Width 128 Bit
Memory Clock Speed 900 MHz
Memory Bandwidth 14.4 GB/s GB/s
Resizable BAR N/A

Power & Efficiency

Power consumption, efficiency, and additional power requirements.

Power Consumption (TDP) N/A W
Power Efficiency N/A
Manufacturing Process 28 nm
Supplementary Power Connectors None

Closest Competitors

Here are some of the closest competitors to this GPU. Compare their power consumption, efficiency, and additional power requirements.


Top Comparisons with Radeon R7 M260

Here are some of the closest competitors to this GPU. Compare their power consumption, efficiency, and additional power requirements.