Explore the complete details of TITAN V VS Radeon Pro WX 8200, including specs, performance benchmarks
GeForce RTX 4090
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 5090 D
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 5080
NVIDIAQuadro K5000
NVIDIAIris Xe Graphics G7
IntelGraphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)
IntelGeForce GTX 570
NVIDIAGraphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)
UnknownRadeon RX 460 Mobile
AMDGeForce GTX 750 Ti
NVIDIAGRID M60-8Q
NVIDIARadeon HD 7850
AMDThe TITAN V GPU by NVIDIA. features a Volta (2017−2020) architecture. with 5120 CUDA cores. and a boost clock of 1455 MHz MHz. It offers HBM2 memory with 12 GB GB capacity and a 3072 Bit-bit interface. delivering a bandwidth of 651.3 GB/s GB/s. With a power consumption (TDP) of 250W. it supports DirectX 12 (12_1), Vulkan +, DLSS 1 for enhanced performance.
The TITAN V GPU by NVIDIA. features a Volta (2017−2020) architecture. with 5120 CUDA cores. and a boost clock of 1455 MHz MHz. It offers HBM2 memory with 12 GB GB capacity and a 3072 Bit-bit interface. delivering a bandwidth of 651.3 GB/s GB/s. With a power consumption (TDP) of 250W. it supports DirectX 12 (12_1), Vulkan +, DLSS 1 for enhanced performance.
Basic details about the TITAN V, including manufacturer, ranking, and release date.
|
![]() |
|
---|---|---|
Manufacturer | NVIDIA | AMD |
Ranking | 90 | 164 |
Popularity Rank | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Architecture | Volta (2017−2020) | GCN 5.0 (2017−2020) |
GPU code name | GV100 | Vega 10 |
Market Segmente | Desktop | Workstation |
Length - Width | 267 mm - 2-slot | 267 mm - 2-slot |
Release Date | 7 December 2017 | 13 August 2018 |
PerformanceDetails on clock speeds, cores, and floating-point processing power of TITAN V VS Radeon Pro WX 8200. |
||
Core Clock Speed | 1200 MHz | 1200 MHz |
Boost Clock Speed | 1455 MHz | 1500 MHz |
Floating Point Processing Power | 14.9 TFLOPS | 10.75 TFLOPS |
No of Transistors | 21,100 million | 12,500 million |
CUDA Cores | 5120 | 3584 |
Ray Tracing Cores | N/A | N/A |
Tensor Cores | 640 | N/A |
Texture Fill Rate | 465.6 | 336.0 |
ROPs | 96 | 64 |
Available display connectors and API compatibility for enhanced performance.
|
![]() |
|
---|---|---|
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 4x mini-DisplayPort |
HDMI | 1 | N/A |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | + | 1.1.125 |
CUDA | 7.0 | N/A |
DLSS | 1 | N/A |
TMUs | 320 | 224 |
Memory & BusInformation on memory type, capacity, and bandwidth to evaluate data processing power. |
||
Memory Type | HBM2 | HBM2 |
Maximum RAM | 12 GB | 8 GB |
Memory Bus Width | 3072 Bit | 2048 Bit |
Memory Clock Speed | 848 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Memory Bandwidth | 651.3 GB/s GB/s | 512.0 GB/s GB/s |
Resizable BAR | N/A | N/A |
Power & EfficiencyPower consumption, efficiency, and additional power requirements. |
||
Power Consumption (TDP) | 250 W | 230 W |
Power Efficiency | 12.13 | 10.10 |
Manufacturing Process | 12 nm | 14 nm |
Supplementary Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Here are some of the closest competitors to this GPU. Compare their power consumption, efficiency, and additional power requirements.
Here are some of the closest competitors to this GPU. Compare their power consumption, efficiency, and additional power requirements.